Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id AAA18892 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:32:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQaaoj29212; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:22:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA08643; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:23:03 -0500
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:23:03 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <310BE7F6.96@cats.ucsc.edu>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Adam Chrystie <adamchry@cats.ucsc.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: A place where NewTek & XAOS should advertise!!!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Scott Burton wrote:
> "Computer Cafe" advertises in that mag and I believe they use LW exclusivly.
>
> Scott Burton - Lightwave Moderator - Command Line BBS
> AJ754@freenet.toronto.on.ca (416) 533-8321
Hey that's great for computer cafe..But, that fact does not do much to advertise
LightWave's capabilites to other potential buyers at other studios. Direct advertising
is more powerful than second hand advertising. But second hand is always good.
Impact-wise, NewTek and Xaos should advertise in there..I feel that XAOS should do
it..because most readers of that magazine know about XAOS and the fact that XAOS is in
charge of the SGI LW..perhaps they (newtek and xaos) should do a joint advertisement
for SGI Lw and Alpha LW...well thats marketing economics and beyond my scope.